Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Hyun-joon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  So Why  12:05, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Kim Hyun-joon

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Searches did not turn up the in-depth coverage to show they pass WP:GNG, and they certainly don't meet WP:NACTOR.  Onel 5969  TT me 18:52, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  00:43, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  00:45, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep He's appeared in enough notable works to pass NACTOR Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 00:08, 1 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment - it's not the number of notable films they've appeared in, but the number of significant roles they've had in notable films. Which he clearly does not pass.  Onel 5969  TT me 00:29, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * All the same, I think he has enough roles in notable films to pass WP:NACTOR, according to the second source on the page. It says he has many roles, both lead and supporting, in notable works. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 01:33, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Just FYI, My Drama List is not a reliable source, as it is user driven.  Onel 5969  TT me 02:42, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * You have a point in that it's not the best source, but it would stand to reason that the information on who was in what work came from the producer's credits,and is thus verifiable. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 03:16, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * And I understand what you're saying, however, there is a reason that user-generated info sites are non-reliable, you would think what you say is true, but if a user can change the info, and a user thinks their personal fave is being "snubbed" or "overlooked", they could classify him more favorably. But even on the used site he only has 3 notable roles. However Gi-Hwa is not a notable film. Not sure if it was direct to video or what, but no listing on imdb.  In fact, not even listed on Kim's imdb profile. The only other "main" role is on a non-notable tv production, The Reason Why I Drink. Other than that, insignificant supporting roles. But thanks for your insight.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:07, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Good point, I can see why user-generated sites wouldn't be reliable. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 21:07, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SophisticatedSwampert let's talk about that 06:31, 5 July 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  So Why  12:14, 13 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.