Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Joo Guan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 03:28, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Kim Joo Guan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Questionably notable and easily speedy and PROD material as my searches simply found nothing better than this and thisand searches at The Business Times, Straits Times, Today and The New Paper and this simply hasn't changed much since starting in January 2010. Pinging the only still active tagger. SwisterTwister  talk  06:53, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:58, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:58, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:58, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete I too found reliable sources lacking for the company and I concur that the article fails to meet notability standards. The food for which the company is reported to be a provider is covered by the article Bakkwa and I don't see the added value in this particular stub of a company profile. Given the paucity of sources, it seems unlikely that the article can be rescued and I note it has languished in its current state for five years. Geoff &#124; Who, me? 20:08, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   16:14, 23 October 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:46, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - searches did not reveal enough to show the article meets notability criteria.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:46, 8 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.