Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Kamberlly


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:10, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Kim Kamberlly

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about a Brazilian actress. The biography does not seem to meet WP:ENT. The article was deleted from Wikipedia in Portuguese per lack of notability. The only "sources" are IMDB (anyone can edit the source) and her Twitter account. Bilhauano (talk) 16:37, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Looked for some reliable sources, and good only see a few articles in Portugese. As pointed out above, only English sources are IMDb and social media, no reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Generally our notability criteria is higher than other language Wikipedias, so if they weren't notable for Portugese Wiki, they're not going to be notable here. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:49, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Bilhauano (talk) 16:59, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:29, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:10, 18 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as mentioned, no better sourcing and not yet satisfying WP:CREATIVE. SwisterTwister   talk  06:29, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Even the weak source of imdb does not indicate they pass WP:NACTOR, with no significant roles, and searches did not turn up anything to show they pass WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:29, 24 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.