Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Kelly (porn star)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sr13 01:19, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Kim Kelly (porn star)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The current version contains no assertion of notability (say by WP:PORNBIO), thus the article qualifies for deletion. I am sending it here rather than PRODing since there have been apparently controversial debates about previous unsourced versions of the article. Sent here as part of the Notability Wikiproject --B. Wolterding 15:48, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete bordering on speedy. Not only is there no claims to any notability, the article could fall under CSD A1 for a very short article with little or no substance. Wildthing61476 16:05, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - an earlier version of the article possibly passes WP:N if someone can dig out sources, but if ever WP:IDONTLIKEIT was a valid argument, now's the time —  irides centi   (talk to me!)  20:18, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per nom. -- Tλε Rαnδоm Eδι  τ  оr   21:52, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I went searching for some sources of the previous version of the article, but all I found were a copy of the press release announcing that Kim was going the ManJuice diet, plus a quickie miniarticle and a really short interview both referring to her starting the interview. In my opinion, there's nothing out there. Tabercil 23:17, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete ad for escort service. JJL 00:58, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete. The "Man Juice Diet" got some news, but not that much. This seems to be the most-quoted article on that, and it isn't much. Other than that, she's just another escort. --AnonEMouse (squeak) 16:12, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. AnonEMouse (squeak) 16:12, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.