Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Krushell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 18:32, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Kim Krushell

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

fails WP:POLITICIAN Ironholds (talk) 13:58, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:05, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:05, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - total failure of WP:POLITICIAN. Eddie.willers (talk) 23:14, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - councillors for major cities are notable (WP:POLITICIAN#2). 117Avenue (talk) 02:27, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * "Major local political figures who have received significant press coverage". Show where this coverage is, please? Ironholds (talk) 02:28, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The link above will take you to over 200 hits. 117Avenue (talk) 02:42, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * All brief mentions. Show how it spans "significant coverage". Ironholds (talk) 02:45, 17 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. @117Avenue do you oppose deleting or keeping the article? You may want to clarify your recommendation and read the guidelines on how to discuss an AfD. It may help in adding clarity to your participation in the discussion. As far as my recommendation, just being an elected official to a local office does not guarantee notability. We need reliable sources that can be properly cited, rather than a list of hits on google. Cindamuse (talk) 00:28, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, city councillors are generally NOT notable per WP:POLITICIAN, unless they've done something wonderful or dastardly, thereby gaining media coverage.  PK  T (alk)  18:14, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.