Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Kyong-hwan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 03:29, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Kim Kyong-hwan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable person. Known for one time event only. There are no any evidence he's a well known activist. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 09:46, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:19, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:19, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:19, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:19, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:22, 7 February 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 03:50, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete although it really difficult to understand the bad-english I can only see a rant at the way the Army and South Korea treated him which was probably the case he made to claim asylum, a one time event. Difficult to work out if he was miffed at being signed up to the military or the really bad way they treated his sexuality. Doesnt appear to have done anything before or since the asylum was granted. MilborneOne (talk) 23:25, 22 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.