Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Mi-jung (manhwa creator)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 15:42, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Kim Mi-jung (manhwa creator)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Verifiability and notability concerns. Can't find reliable, secondary sources (or, really, anything) on this manga artist whose name is identical to a better-known judoka. Claims of two redlinked one-shots and a magazine publication do not give me much hope that there's much out there, but it's possible that this artist has had some other successes since 2007 when the primary content here was written, so, additional sources welcomed if you can find 'em, I couldn't. joe deckertalk to me 14:33, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:17, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:17, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Jujutacular  talk 13:30, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: unable to find any coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject of this unsourced BLP. J04n(talk page) 14:07, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep if she is really the creator of a genre of cartoon art, then how could she not be notable? Why not question that point on the talk page of the article, instead of bring it here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jtbobwaysf (talk • contribs) 12:44, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Nothing makes the claim that she created a genre of cartoon art. For your information, the parenthetical in the article title is a parenethetical disambiguator, not a claim that the putative author created a genre, and is present to disambiguate her from the much better sourced judoka of the same name. We use that naming convention, where we disambiguate articles based on what someone allegedly does quite a bit. Certainly "Hey, this author created a whole genre of art" would, be something worth noting, although even so, it'd require verification through reliable sources. --joe deckertalk to me 14:17, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Change vote from Keep to Delete - Oops, thank you for clarification Joe Decker. I change my vote to delete. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 17:24, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * No worries, made that mistake myself a couple times. Have a great week!  --joe deckertalk to me 01:41, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.