Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Miller


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Barkeep49 (talk) 02:13, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Kim Miller

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG, and has been tagged as such for 12 years. Boleyn (talk) 17:41, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disability-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 17:44, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 17:44, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 17:44, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment Though Miller's notability is doubtful, the book about her, The Girl Who Spoke With Pictures, has received several reviews, at least one in an academic journal, so an article about the book seems possible. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 08:47, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NativeForeigner Talk 06:16, 16 March 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 06:31, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak keep: Reviews in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders and Foreword Reviews indicate that The Girl Who Spoke With Pictures meets WP:NBOOK#1 and the content in this article is plausibly useful in writing The Girl Who Spoke With Pictures. A move to that page, and refocusing on the book, would be good. My !vote is "weak" because I'm not fully convinced of Foreword Reviewss reliability. — Bilorv ( talk ') 16:57, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. "The Girl Who Spoke With Pictures" is a book by her mother, so I have to assume inherent bias. Also, I am not finding any news articles related to Kim Miller, so I would think despite her accomplishments, her notability is very thin. LovelyLillith (talk) 17:30, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Lack of sources which would make her biography notable. If others are not giving importance to her biography then why we should? Tessaracter (talk) 17:24, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Potential notability is inherited from the book The Girl Who Spoke With Pictures. Cheers, 1292simon (talk)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.