Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Mullen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep. Deathphoenix ʕ 14:56, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Kim Mullen
Relisted per Articles for deletion/Brady Finta (et. al), no vote. — Mar. 3, '06 [07:56] 
 * Delete as not notable. Unverifiable speculation. No context/importance outside Survivor. -- Krash (Talk) 15:43, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Survivor: Palau. Comments above remain applicable. -- Krash (Talk) 19:34, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Per Krash -- Vary | Talk 15:52, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete So she was a former Miss USA contestant, but considering she's not a winner, runner up or not even being in the top rankings. I'm not sure if that warrants her own article.  Alternatively, re-direct without merge if thats the general consenus -- Arnzy | Talk 15:58, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per precedent and WP:BIO. --Rob 18:03, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * What precedent are you referring to? Outcome of the previous AfD was delete (Articles for deletion/Brady Finta). -- Krash (Talk) 18:11, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Look at precedents over several months. Also, I include Big Brother precedents, as the show shares enough relevant characteristics with Survivor.  The AFD you cited was going against precedent, and going against the spirit of BIO.  Also, I'm just waiting for somebody to explain what these AFDs accomplish, that sensible merge/redirects (where appropriate) don't.  It's foolish to destroy information, when we can, on on-going basis, make an editorial decision about whether info goes in the main article, or the individual bio article.  Deleting this today, just means somebody has to make a fresh one, from scratch,  in the future (as this AFD doesn't apply to new, original, creations).  --Rob 18:48, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Neutral for now, until a concrete policy is reached about ALL articles of this nature. Deckiller 00:49, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep She was miss Ohio. Eivind 02:53, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep for pageant title, per the last AFD. -Colin Kimbrell 18:34, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep... local paper has written biography of her, accomplishments outside of Suvivor noted, prominent in local community. Calwatch 09:54, 6 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.