Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Revell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:52, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Kim Revell

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Poorly sourced BLP of a non-notable person. Declined for CSD. Fails WP:BASIC. - MrX 11:35, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep She scored 5 goals in 31 matches for the Australia women's national association football team between 1995 and 2001., p. 54. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 12:42, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:39, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:39, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:39, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:39, 2 July 2014 (UTC)


 * keep meets WP:NFOOTY, through playing for national team. LibStar (talk) 15:42, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - clearly meets WP:NFOOTBALL; needs improving, not deleting. GiantSnowman 17:47, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Does NFOOTBALL really mean a referee is notable if they work a match? That borders on the preposterous.Two kinds of pork (talk) 19:14, 3 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment: She has scored for the Matildas against France in 2001 (2-1 in Coffs Harbour, Cheryl Salisbury added second goal) (SBS). --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 14:03, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Editors may need to keep in mind that this page was created, and 're-created' by likely sockpuppets of indef. blocked editor . --220  of  Borg 15:50, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Bureaucrats might want to keep that in mind, but editors and readers interested in the history of women's soccer in Australia couldn't care less. From WP:BANREVERT "This does not mean that edits must be reverted just because they were made by a banned editor". The-Pope (talk) 05:10, 6 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Notable footballer who played at the highest level. The-Pope (talk) 05:10, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Footballer who played for a national team currently in the top ten in the FIFA rankings. I really have to ask: would we even be having this discussion for a male player who had played 31 times for any national team? The article does need work, but that is an argument for doing the work not deletion. Wilmot1 (talk) 12:28, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep I can only assume this is an error on the part of the nominator. Nfitz (talk) 19:24, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.