Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Rowoon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 21:25, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Kim Rowoon

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A case of WP:TOOSOON (to add: Individual members of SF9, with the exception of Kang_Chan-hee, are NOT notable enough to have their own articles as their activities are exclusively within the group SF9 and nowhere else.) Tibbydibby (talk) 17:02, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor 19:41, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor 19:41, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor 19:41, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Alternative search terms:


 * Comment @ : WP:TOOSOON is not a policy-based reason for deletion, could the deletion rationale be expanded, please? Prima facie the article doesn't look like much, but a search for the Hangul 김석우 reveals a lot of hits. I do not speak Korean, what do all these search results reveal? — Sam Sailor 19:55, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete not enough acting roles to meet our inclusion criteria.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:47, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:MUSICBIO. Not independently notable outside of his group. — ξ xplicit  01:55, 20 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.