Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Ruff


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus w/o prejudice to a speedy renomination. There is only one clear !vote but the two other comments make a "soft delete" untenable. And there is no consensus for a hard delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:21, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Kim Ruff

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:MUSIC. No citations. May be promotional Actaudio (talk) 05:20, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 05:28, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 05:28, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 05:28, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 05:28, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment Nominator says "No citations", in the sense of "no footnotes" (how come no-one tagged it for that in the six years since article creation?), but there are 20 references (bare URLs - again no-one tagged till just now), which include at least one detailed review here which go towards GNG even if not NMUSIC.  Most of the rest seem to be for the BLP1E of getting nominated for 2009 award although not winning.  Pam  D  10:06, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete does not meet notability guidelines for music.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:04, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~   {talk}  01:10, 28 February 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment The article has had revisions, cleanup and information added since the original nomination. Millionaire10 wrote on the talk page he/she has an interest in working on the page (and fixing the lack of citations in the text) but may need some time (or someone to help). If the Stellar Awards are considered "notable" this could be worth building out and keeping. Actaudio (talk) 23:20, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Atlantic306 (talk) 19:28, 7 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.