Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Shaw


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. — CharlotteWebb 16:50, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Kim Shaw
Unlikely to meet Wikipedia's biographical criteria. May not meet our standards, but could easily be transwiki'd to a more appropriate wiki under the GFDL. Solumeiras (talk) 18:47, 5 February 2008 (UTC) 
 * Redirect to Heart 106 or another appropriate page. Probably well known in the East Midlands region, but not outside of that (although I seem to recall her at Heart FM in Birmingham). There are lots of these DJ articles, and I would personally be in favour of merging many of them into something like List of British DJs. Paul20070 (talk) 21:51, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to Wikipopuli, a more suitable wiki for biographies of people whose notability is in question. All these British DJs could appropriately be listed there. 23:20, 5 February 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheYellowCabin (talk • contribs)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 21:33, 14 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep: It's a stub. It needs development, not deletion. Jonathan Luckett (talk) 10:21, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep: I think it should not be deleted. 'cuz she does exist, the article can be expanded yet. And if we change this article to Redirect and she changes her job, what should we do? her information will be gone forever, though she is a notable person. It's not what we want. --Carl Daniels (talk) 12:43, 15 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.