Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Spencer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was redirect to Link TV.  Ry an P os tl et hw ai te  23:33, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Kim Spencer

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No comment on Link Media's notability, but Kim Spencer's work doesn't appear to meet WP:BIO as he doesn't appear to have been much of a groundbreaker in the fields he's worked. This reads like a resume with a touch of Wiki is not LinkedIn and there don't appear to be many sources available to re-write, hence my doubts on notability. Travellingcari (talk) 06:31, 3 February 2008 (UTC) 
 * Redirect to Link TV. I added a source there that mentions him. Jfire (talk) 20:51, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Jfire. D.M.N. (talk) 15:01, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 * KEEP, a cursory web search seems to show that it meets basic and additional criteria through WP:BIO. However, there has been allegations that the text was cut and pasted from the Link TV website; if this is true, then Speedy Delete.--Sallicio$\color{Red} \oplus$ 18:17, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JERRY talk contribs 00:39, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete: I don't care that the person has a high profile: the "biography" here is a curriculum vitae, and Wikipedia is not Monster.com.  We do not house CV's.  If this were a biography or about the person, then it would be written like a biography or a discussion of a person.  Instead, it is a business listing.  Nor is there some point in saying, "Leave it alone and wait for a biographer to emerge in the mists of time," because every day that it sits like this is a day that another executive gets the idea that he should enter the same bland boasts into Wikipedia.  Utgard Loki (talk) 15:49, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Link TV. There don't seem to be any secondary sources that mention him non-trivially. –   j ak s mata  19:50, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  23:20, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Warrior4321talkContribs 00:39, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.