Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Stallwood


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ansh 666 07:21, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Kim Stallwood

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No cited sources. No substantial coverage apparent in Google News Archive search. Not much engagement from other scholars on their books (eg.). Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPROF. Daask (talk) 15:50, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. &#8208;&#8208;1997kB (talk) 16:09, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. &#8208;&#8208;1997kB (talk) 16:09, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. &#8208;&#8208;1997kB (talk) 16:09, 15 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete this reads like a resume, not an encyclopedia article. Especially the "he has over 40 years expeirence" that is the wording for a resume. The fact that the article lacks sources is another problem, but the format is just plain off.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:19, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per John - Clearly written by her or someone close to her, Anyway no evidence of notability. – Davey 2010 Talk 20:47, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete No references in a Bio qualifies for proposed deletion. There is no coverage either. AmericanAir88 (talk) 01:58, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete, as WP:NOTRESUME, this is almost a word for word copy from his webpage here so WP:COPYVIO may also apply? his book Growl has not made much impact (in 25 libraries), although there are reviews out there ie. The Vegan - here, Journal for Critical Animal Studies - here, so the book might just squeak over WP:NBOOK but that is all. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:08, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment The page is such a mess because an ip (presumably with a coi) hijacked it on 3 October, copypasting their version straight over the top. If you roll it back to 22 June 2016, its a fairly neat stub with 3 refs. I would try and revert back, but I'm not sure what that would do to the deletion notice. Anyway,I found a few more sources, none great but..University of Caterbury bio, Local newspaper review of the Growl book Interview with Vegetarian magazine. Curdle (talk) 00:55, 22 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.