Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Stetz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 06:51, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Kim Stetz

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NACTOR/WP:GNG/WP:BASIC/WP:NBIO. Ref 1 is unreliable, per its about us page it aims to help an expanding community of yoga enthusiasts, but little editorial policies, subject-matter-expertise, or WP:USEBYOTHERS to indicate that it's WP:RS. Ref 2 is an interview that is likely non-independent and non-secondary, ref 3 is written by Kim herself, ref 4 is a non-RS Blogger blog mentioning Kim once, ref 5 is a non-SIGCOV news announcement quoting Kim's experience in a gas leak, ref 6 is a trivial mention; all of the refs I found per WP:BEFORE, e.g., 1, 2, appear to be trivial and non-SIGCOV. Kim's roles are also minor or in non-notable shows/films/shorts, failing NACTOR.  VickKiang  (talk)  06:34, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  VickKiang  (talk)  06:36, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete  Promotional, badly formatted article. No sources that show she's near GNG.
 * Oaktree b (talk) 15:51, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, Health and fitness,  and New York.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:21, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and WP:PROMO - I also found a December 2021 press release, and notability does not appear to be supported by independent and reliable sources per WP:BASIC or other notability guidelines. Beccaynr (talk) 20:30, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Not a well trimmed article, fails notability. NMasiha (talk) 21:14, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG. Best, GPL93 (talk) 19:54, 26 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.