Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim evoy

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was redirect all of them to Chamberlain v. Surrey School District No. 36 since the content has already been merged. Sjakkalle (Check!)  07:00, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Kim evoy, Pam glass and Shawn wilson
These articles have identical contents, except for the name of the school trustee in question. The incident itself is notable, but I don't think individual trustees behind it are, especially with articles like these. Merge into an article about the incident. &mdash; J I P | Talk 07:37, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge, concur. Kappa 07:49, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge. The incident is notable, but the individuals involved are not. Please use the content to form an article on the incident itself. Harro5 08:24, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge as above. Radiant_* 11:34, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * Agreed. Merge. -- BD2412 talk 13:27, 2005 Jun 3 (UTC)
 * This info should go has been put on a page discussing the court case: Chamberlain v. Surrey School District No. 36. -- BD2412 talk 13:36, 2005 Jun 3 (UTC)
 * Since the notable information has already been merged, per BD2412, these three can be deleted. Jonathunder 05:38, 2005 Jun 5 (UTC)
 * Delete all. This information has been merged. JamesBurns 10:24, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, has been merged. Leanne 10:26, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.  Please do not edit this page .