Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimberly Amadeo (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 19:27, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Kimberly Amadeo
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Google hits and article references all lead to links trying to sell books and DVDs. Attempts in the article to establish notability of the subject (President of WorldMoneyWatch.com, expert at about.com) are also nothing but attempts to sell products. Beach drifter (talk) 23:43, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

i think these sentences are enough for showing that Kimberly Amadeo is famouse between the people who cares about US economy ans the owners of small businesses .if you take look at the about.com you can find out how many people know her.--Navid1366 (talk) 19:42, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment i am the writer of this article .""She is the economic expert for About.com[1], one of the top ten most visited websites and a part of the New York Times.[2][3]""
 * But, Navid, look at this google news search, there's been nothing written about her.--Milowent • talkblp-r 02:18, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:36, 12 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - No significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources. The sourcing in the article is a link to the about.com front page which isn't really a reference at all, and to resumes/bios that are essetnially the equivalent of a press release.  Amadeo does does not inherit notability by writing for about.com, a notable site, nor does she inherit notability from the fact that about.com is owned by the NY Times. -- Whpq (talk) 17:03, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per Whpq. -- Joaquin008  ( talk ) 16:01, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above. There is significant mention of her in reputable, third-party sources. - SudoGhost (talk) 03:02, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.