Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimberly Johnson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:40, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Kimberly Johnson

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not sure how notable this author is? Cssiitcic (talk) 18:20, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 15:10, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Comment. This AFD was not entered onto the AFD log. I've done that now. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 15:10, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 17:42, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 17:42, 11 May 2011 (UTC)


 * weak keep nea & guggenheim. i'd say the john donne archive is good work, body of work small, but early in career. Slowking4 (talk) 15:30, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep due to Guggenheim Fellowship. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 21:49, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Possibly the Guggenheim Fellowship wouldn't be enough on its own, but her works are reviewed in reliable sources, including by The Independent in the UK and there are RS articles covering the subject herself. FlowerpotmaN &middot;( t ) 00:21, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.