Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kin relationship


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy delete.-Wafulz (talk) 17:29, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Kin relationship

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This was up for speedy, was deleted by an IP I think. There's not really much to say other than...it's complete bollocks. Gromlakh (talk) 03:58, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, as this is obviously made up -- "kin relationship" is a recognized term, but it means a relationship via blood, marriage, or adoption, not what the article says at all. -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 04:22, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, complete horse hockey. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 04:23, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Unreferenced, original research, does not meet notability.  Lady   Galaxy  04:53, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unsourced neologism with no potential due to conflict in meaning with existing term. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:31, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I heard these type of um... arrangements during my High school years but I don't think it has an official name or has achieved widespread practice. Anyways sources from Google search point to Kinship.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 07:28, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * NN neologism. Should have been speedy deleted. User:Dorftrottel 08:49, January 22, 2008
 * Speedy delete pretty much nonsense, although the part at the end about how to make serial numbers for hookups is kind of funny: "If you went out with Sam Smith on Feb 14th, it would be KinSS0214 / The date would be always 4 numbers if you want year it would be KinSS021407 (Provided it was in 2007)" etc. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:33, 22 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.