Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kinard Core Knowledge Junior High School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was redirect to Poudre School District. --Core desat 05:47, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Kinard Core Knowledge Junior High School

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

though catchy to the eye, does not establish notability for a four year old middle school Chris 04:29, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Poudre School District; notability not established by WP:ORG due to lack of significant independent sources. Maybe there's even one or two paragraphs that might be merged to there. By the way, you might want to nominate Kinard building too. --B. Wolterding 10:47, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 18:26, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 18:26, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect or delete nn school. Carlossuarez46 21:05, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable buildings are sufficient for notability, tho it needs to be documented better--I understand from the AfD discussion on the building that there were awards. One article, but not two, is justified, & I think it should be this one. DGG 03:46, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
 * If the building is notable, we should have an article about the building. (I actually don't think it is, and the AfD discussion Articles for deletion/Kinard building rather tends towards "delete", I'd say.) I don't see a point in the school article that would make it pass WP:ORG. Notability is not inherited; the school doesn't make the building notable and vice versa. --B. Wolterding 09:42, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Poudre School District as above. As noted on the related AfD, the building does not meet the notability threshold either. Eusebeus 11:49, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.