Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kincardine Beach Pavilion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 06:57, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Kincardine Beach Pavilion

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 04:56, 23 August 2011 (UTC) Source and information are not proper --Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 04:57, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: No assertion of notability in the article, absolutely fails GNG --Slashme (talk) 06:29, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment This article was nominated for deletion less than 2 hours after it was created. There are available references that I've added to the article. Whether these are sufficient to demonstrate notability, I'm dubious, but there is a case not only for WP:BEFORE but for a period of working with an editor to improve a new article rather than jumping to AfD. AllyD (talk) 07:09, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 09:31, 23 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep . This article is about 1 day old, and this AfD is way too premature. Re-nominate at a later date if notability cannot be established, but give time for developing it.  Comment: the article needs a good proof-read, and the heading that's in all-caps has to be rewritten using proper capitalization.   PK  T (alk)  15:28, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete. Opinion changed because article's initiator hasn't done anything to help salvage his/her work.   PK  T (alk)  07:57, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
 * AFD is not cleanup nor is there a WP:Deadline. AFD is to get consensus about the potential of a Articles. What your implying is that if Stubs cant rise to Article status before the end of AFD's they deserve to be deleted ? Exit2DOS • Ctrl • Alt • Del 23:02, 31 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:57, 30 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Weak keep or merge into Kincardine, Ontario.--Milowent • talkblp-r 20:16, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable building.  Fails WP:NOTABILITY.  Dolphin  ( t ) 22:45, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep it was notable enough in its day to draw notable bands, and there are RS's out there for it, but it does need work to bring it above stub status. Exit2DOS • Ctrl • Alt • Del 23:02, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete There is absolutely nothing to indicate notability in the article, or at Google or Google News Archive, or even on the website of this local dance hall. No historic importance, no coverage at all except for a couple of local "this event will be held at the Kincardine Beach Pavilion" type listings. Nobody seems to have given it a historic designation, and if there are Reliable Sources out there as claimed by Exit, I couldn't find them - just the one mention in a highly specialized book. BTW about half of the article is copied verbatim from the pavilion's own website . --MelanieN (talk) 14:55, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete venue is indistinctCurb Chain (talk) 09:00, 6 September 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.