Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kindred Healthcare


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 17:17, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Kindred Healthcare

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Flagged as an advert since February 2014, this article relies on regurgitated press releases and PR pieces as references. It has a massive set of COI disclosures on the talk page. Fiddle  Faddle  12:20, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. If the article has problems, then it needs work, not deletion. Everyking (talk) 13:29, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:32, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:32, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:33, 8 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. Agreed with Everyking, and it's a Fortune 500 company (that fact alone means it's a notable company).  Improve it.  Stevie is the man!  Talk • Work 13:58, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Reading five words into the article shows that this topic is listed on the NYSE.  With some quick mousing over the references, I found two articles from bizjournals and one from money.cnn.com.  Skimming the article, I couldn't verify that this is an advertisement.  The only thing I noticed is that most of the BLP info needs to have Template:CN tags added.  Unscintillating (talk) 00:30, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 18:37, 15 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Rarely is a listed corporation is not-notable.-- danntm T C 23:17, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.