Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kine Ludvigsen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mojo Hand (talk) 00:36, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Kine Ludvigsen

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This topic not has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.Trivial mentions are not enough. Malikul Mout (talk) 04:50, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Malikul Mout (talk) 04:50, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Norway.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:27, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Question for the nominator In the very short period of time that you have begun editing you have nominated this and two other articles (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mikey Freedom Hart & Articles for deletion/Rei Prendi) with essentially this exact same wording, can you elaborate on the specific notability and referencing issues with this article? GPL93 (talk) 22:23, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * .i know i have started editing few days ago but i know how to edit and a Wikipedia articleArticles for deletion/Rei Prendi in this article i didn't find any useful source and i nominated that article for delete but it doesn't mean this article should be deleted the all Wikipedia editor's can give your suggestion. if you found anything useful you can mention in the discussion if i am nominating any page it doesn't mean it is going to be removed Malikul Mout(talk)
 * There is already in-depth sourcing from referencing from reliable sources such as Vårt Land, Østlendingen, Nettavisen, and NRK already within the article An additional WP:BEFORE search quickly brings up further referencing such as this. To say that "trivial mentions are not enough" and just copy-paste an AfD rationale from your previous nomination is frankly irresponsible. Best, GPL93 (talk) 14:21, 23 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep per statements above. The article definitely needs work, but AfD is WP:NOTCLEANUP. Best, GPL93 (talk) 14:27, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your advice. I worked on cleaning up the page.Addisonson (talk) 12:33, 28 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep - enough coverage to meet WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 16:40, 25 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.