Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kinergy power


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 02:05, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Kinergy power

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable company. Headbomb {{{sup|ταλκ}}κοντριβς – WP Physics} 03:12, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:38, 4 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete--though I wish the nominator had added a bit of content. This article suffers from a bunch of things: it's pretty blatant advertising, it is unverified, and the subject is not yet notable. A google search reveals nothing but blogs submitted, probably, by the "Westchester business executives" who are on the team (the article is almost a carbon copy of an attempt at swaying green-minded folks on an energy site, at http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/harnessing-power-highways/). So, there's no independent third-party coverage that I can find, and a look at the page's history shows pretty easily what's going on: marketing. Maybe, as the creator of the article claims, this is all on the up and up, and maybe this will save the world (I cite the Talk page), but I'll wait till I read about it in the paper. Drmies (talk) 15:36, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:26, 9 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:27, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:34, 14 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete I would've tried to speedy or prod. :) ChildofMidnight (talk) 07:13, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as fails WP:CORP for lack of sourcing. Interesting idea, nobility to come perhaps. --Gavin Collins (talk) 14:28, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article has been around for well over a year and has never progressed beyond the same vague content and non-notable sources. Searches on the company and its people still fail to produce anything of note. Flowanda | Talk 11:09, 18 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.