Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kinetic Void


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:57, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Kinetic Void

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I nominated this for deletion using the PROD process and was reverted. I'm taking this to AFD as the next logical step. My comment was: Non-notable game that does not have WP:SIGCOV. WP:BEFORE shows one review in a situational source which does not meet the WP:GNG. Jontesta (talk) 05:08, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Jontesta (talk) 05:08, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete No obvious reason for the deprod. Fails GNG and a BEFORE failed to find significant coverage. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 05:27, 28 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Yep, game is dead, and left no lasting mark even in failure. I'm for deletion. BlockBadger42 (talk) 14:46, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
 * • Delete sorry BlockBadger42 (talk) 14:54, 28 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete as long as no secondary sources are found. Daranios (talk) 15:46, 30 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.