Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King's College, University of Queensland


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was merge with University of Queensland (specifically, the Other facilities section). Giggy Talk 09:55, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

King's College, University of Queensland
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable dorm. Speciate 09:29, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletions. KTC 10:11, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   -- Bduke 11:54, 4 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete nn. KTC 10:11, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge with University of Queensland.--JForget 23:10, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * This article is so much worse and incomplete than articles on Colleges at Melbourne University, Sydney University and Adelaide University, that a merge to the University seems best for now until someone gets round to witting good articles on the Colleges at U of Q. --Bduke 00:20, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge to UQ's article for the moment. The college is sufficiently old/large/significant etc that I'm sure a reasonably-written article could be written about it, but the best idea would be to hive it off from UQ's article after it gets too big there, rather than keep this one hanging around at the moment. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 05:13, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Just to clarify terms here, in case US-English and Australian-English are clashing. The building in question is a residential building at the university, rather than a university itself. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 23:32, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge to University of Queensland. Twenty Years 05:54, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge Unsourced and, as such, doesn't meet WP:ORG, but arguably warrants coverage. Break back out when/if it becomes long enough to warrant it and has clear and sourced case for independent notability. MrZaius  talk  21:04, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete schoolcruft. Colleges shoule meet WP:CORP, this article does not.Garrie 22:27, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep but rewrite completely. The subject matter is notable. The fact that the article is in poor shape at the moment does not mean it cannot be expanded and improved in the future. However as the article stands, it is a copyvio of http://www.kings.uq.edu.au/index.html?page=29803, so it will need rewriting immediately anyway.--Yeti Hunter 00:50, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.