Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King's Leigh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – czar   20:21, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

King's Leigh

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Dacland Pty Ltd is the developer. If created, it would fail the WP:CORPDEPTH test for notability.
 * Summary: This is a non-notable real estate development. It is not a new suburb in Werribee, Victoria, Australia
 * Reference analysis:
 * 1) http://kingsleigh.com.au/living-at-kings-leigh/the-story// - this is simply a restatement by the developer to prospective buyers
 * 2) http://www.realestate.com.au/project-king%27s+leigh-vic-werribee-600005183 - an online advertisement on  Realestate.com.au for this real estate development
 * 3) http://dacland.com.au/our-communities/ - A page by the real estate developers
 * 4) http://kingsleigh.com.au/living-at-kings-leigh/the-developer// -  A page by the real estate developers
 * 5) http://kingsleigh.com.au/pdf/kingsleigh_nowselling.pdf./ - A page by the real estate developers. It 404s, but that is not the issue here.
 * Should this be redirected to the developer?

--Shirt58 (talk) 11:32, 19 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete If we consider this to be an article about a company (which is fair since it does not qualify for WP:NGEO) then it would completely fail WP:CORP, not to mention the fact that it apparently doesn't even exist yet. § FreeRangeFrog croak 17:45, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 20 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete It reads very much like an advert to me. Alec Station (talk) 13:17, 20 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.