Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King's Little Jewels Learning Center


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Antipolo. Black Kite (talk) 18:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

King's Little Jewels Learning Center

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

K-6 school, no meaningful external reliable source coverage (currently-cited sources are simply lists of schools.) NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 08:24, 4 February 2017 (UTC) *Delete non notable encyclopedia material.I have an alternate account, User:BethOne .(Cfgvhbj (talk) 01:30, 12 February 2017 (UTC)) false vote by an impersonating editor struck out  Velella  Velella Talk 01:35, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - highly promotional. I removed some clear ownership content but there is nothing here that even alludes to notability. Purely advertising  Velella  Velella Talk 10:04, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Same as above. Not notable. Ethanbastalk 23:06, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Antipolo per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, as I see no reason why this article is a particular exception. If there's an article about a more local authority or government agency than the Department of Education in the Philippines, I would support that. Appable (talk | contributions) 10:50, 4 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Antipolo, as per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. North America1000 01:37, 12 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.