Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King's Student Law Review


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. Speedy A7 JForget  01:22, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

King's Student Law Review
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

non notable website, speedy removed as first edit by new user Wuh  Wuz  Dat  16:48, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete, db-web. Hairhorn (talk) 17:18, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Peer-reviewed is one thing, but peer-reviewed student writing still does not make this publication notable. I guess db-web would apply, yes. Drmies (talk) 18:03, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete: The only sources that I can find in searches are the website itself and Wikipedia. Joe Chill (talk) 19:54, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete I had tagged this page with CSD A7, but it somehow got removed. Non-notable website. Netalarm  04:31, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL, not yet ripe. Peer-reviewed student law reviews and journals, once they have been publishing a while, could become notable.  Do not "salt". Bearian (talk) 15:54, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.