Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King's Wrath


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Fiona McIntosh with the option to merge any viable sourced content that isn't already in the parent article. Vanamonde (Talk) 10:31, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

King's Wrath

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Third book in a trilogy, all appear to fail WP:GNG/WP:NBOOK. (I don't know how to nominate three articles in one AfD, so please see Articles for deletion/Royal Exile and Articles for deletion/Tyrant's Blood for other discussions. This article has an unreferenced reception section that seems to be based on the book's publisher blurb. I can't find any reliable coverage of it otherwise. Courtesy ping User:Pburka who removed prod for this, with a comment: "Likely notable book. Translated into Dutch and French; nominated for 2011 Gemmell awar (see isfdb.org). But we should consider merging all three books into one article.". I don't think translations are relevant to establishing notability (I think there was a Polish one too, shrug). I cannot find much about the Gemmel award, it appears rather minor (and a nomination carries less weight then winning something anyway). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:01, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy, Literature,  and Australia. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  09:01, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to author Fiona McIntosh per WP:ATD pending the discovery of any reliable sources. The author seems notable so it is a valid redirection. If sources are found, no qualms as to the recreation of the articles. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:07, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Redirect to Fiona McIntosh per the lack of significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Notability (books) says: "A book is presumed notable if it verifiably meets, through reliable sources, at least one of the following criteria:The book has been the subject of two or more non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself. This can include published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, other books, television documentaries, bestseller lists, and reviews. This excludes media re-prints of press releases, flap copy, or other publications where the author, its publisher, agent, or other self-interested parties advertise or speak about the book." I found one source about the subject:  There is insufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow King's Wrath to pass Notability, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Cunard (talk) 07:32, 14 August 2022 (UTC) 
 * Either merge into Royal Exile, the notable first book in the series, or merge all three into Valisar Trilogy. pburka (talk) 13:31, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge/Redirect per Pburka. The trilogy is notable even if this book is not. Archrogue (talk) 20:02, 15 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.