Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King Arthur in various media


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 21:26, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

King Arthur in various media
WP:LIST and WP:LC, Merge to King Arthur, GFDL violation.--Gaaa 22:04, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Where to start?
 * Is a good article
 * Seems to me to fall squarely within WP:LIST not to breach it.
 * WP:LC is an essay, not itself a ground for deletion. Even if it was, I'd conclude this isn't listcruft.
 * This is Articles for deletion. You don't need to come here to propose a merge.
 * Article is too long to merge anywhere, anyway.
 * "GFDL violation" is ridiculously unspecific. In what way does this article breach GFDL?
 * All in all, not-very-good-nom.
 * Keep AndyJones 23:04, 16 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep. This was split off the King Arthur article, which had become way too long. What do you mean GFDL violation?--Cúchullain t/ c 22:57, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Seems a well-researched list of a reasonably important topic, which is a valid split from the long King Arthur entry. Espresso Addict 23:57, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep per Espresso Addict. -- Nish kid 64 01:22, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per AndyJones. Danny Lilithborne 22:36, 17 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.