Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King Cobra Special Forces


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 21:21, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

King Cobra Special Forces
Unverifiable article (so fails WP:V): title gives no Google hits at all (and so does the "new name"). Even if verified somehow, it would still be a non notable organisation (not one important event cited in the article). I have not checked their website (my virusscanner isn't that good, and I don't want to take the risk) Fram 19:01, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 11:02, 15 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete make-believe. Their website http://www.kingcobraspecialforces.piczo.com is, surprisingly, slightly elaborate. Click on "Can you help us?" in the menu and the following message appears: "If you have knowledge of a crime or a crime that has been committed email us kingcobaspecialforces@hotmail.co.uk If you think you have what it takes to be a operative email us using the addresses above."  I wish the young feller the best of luck in finding recruits.  Pan Dan 11:32, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The article cites no sources. Like Fram I can find no sources.  I don't know what web page Pan Dan is referring to.  The web site given in the article yields a simple message from the hosting service, Piczo, that no such page exists, for me.  The posturing about signing the Official Secrets Act is a bad sign, also.  Too secret for Wikipedia.  Delete. Uncle G 11:42, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * (have added website above) Pan Dan 11:47, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I just copied and pasted the domain name in the article, which is slightly different. (Apparently, Pizco hasn't heard of RFC 2396.) Uncle G 12:32, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per nom, WP:RS, WP:NOT, WP:ADVERT, WP:OR and, of course WP:STUPID. NeoFreak 07:08, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete complete nonsense from start to finish. Official secrets act - yeah right! --Charlesknight 09:11, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * SPEEDY DELETE at first I thought this had something to do with G.I.Joe or something, but after looking at it...it smacks of either patent nonsense or something someone invented in school one day. Either way, it must really be boring in North Kent. &mdash;ExplorerCDT 22:05, 17 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.