Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King Fahad Specialist Hospital Dammam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. It is a notable hospital. (non-admin closure) Good afternoon (talk) 13:20, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

King Fahad Specialist Hospital Dammam

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article created by WP:SPA, with primary function of WP:ADVERT and WP:PROMO. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 21:01, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 21:04, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:46, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:47, 2 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 01:54, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Keep, notable hospital, and if you feel that a particular wording is promotional, you may reword it. The final passage is backed up by http://books.google.com/books?id=z6d_3NJj-uUC&pg=PA286 (albeit this is clearly not an entirely neutral publication). --Soman (talk) 18:27, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 03:36, 16 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. Per Soman, and also I removed excessive negative tagging of article, now not an orphan, now not unreferenced, no need for duplicative advert tags, so no need for "multiple issues" tag.  Actually it doesn't seem like an advert to me, either. -- do  ncr  am  17:30, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.