Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King Hiss


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to List of He-Man and the Masters of the Universe characters. Redirect target already contains significant information about the subject and is another unjustified WP:CONTENTFORK. (non-admin closure) Aydoh8 (talk &#124; contribs) 11:56, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

King Hiss

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No evidence that this is notable per BEFORE. 🍕 Boneless Pizza! 🍕 (🔔) 06:35, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy,  and Television.  🍕  Boneless Pizza! 🍕 (🔔) 06:35, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  10:44, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Merge to List of He-Man and the Masters of the Universe characters. I don't have the time to go through and search for sources myself to form an opinion on notability, but this is the obvious WP:Alternative to deletion which preserves the article in the history for possible future use and I think something from here can improve the corresponding section at the target. Daranios (talk) 15:08, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Merge to List of He-Man and the Masters of the Universe characters. A sensible medium-term alternative to Delete, and an article that can be patched up on and improved. Should sources for GNG be found it can always be returned to standalone. Comment I know next to nothing about MOTU and care about it even less than that, but this flood of near-identical nominations would give anyone with the knowledge to put together a Keep vote far too much research to do. This is yet another case of eschewing a potentially constructive discussion on talk pages that could genuinely improve articles and Wikipedia by selectively merging salvageable material to a strong list instead being turned into someone yelling "BALEET!" because it's easier. I used to wonder why so many articles are neglected. Now I know it's because passionate editors get tired of being at the mercy of lazy rubbish like this. BoomboxTestarossa (talk) 10:12, 24 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.