Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King of Fighters R-1


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Daniel (talk) 10:02, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

King of Fighters R-1

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

If this is notable why has it remained unsourced for 15 years? Chidgk1 (talk) 16:28, 8 October 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:18, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Chidgk1 (talk) 16:28, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment - As a Japan-only release, there may be some Japanese reviews/sources, though they may be hard to find online now. I will note that on the Japanese Wikipedia, this game actually does not have its own article, and it is just covered as part of the article on the KoF franchise. If no sources can be found, this should at least be redirected to List of The King of Fighters video games rather than deleted. Rorshacma (talk) 19:54, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep The game has reviews from Pocket Magazine and Video Games magazine, and some other reviews that may not be reliable. However, it also got a blurb in Retro Gamer and a full review in Fun Generation. Per WP:NEXIST it appears fully notable, sources currently in the article are irrelevant. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 00:03, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. The sources identified by ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ look to be enough to me.  Eluchil404 (talk) 17:29, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 *  Weak keep per sources given above. I'm not entirely convinced of their reliability, but it seems reasonable to think that offline/non-English sources do exist. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 23:03, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
 * striking out weak, multiple refideas present on talk page. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 23:15, 22 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.