Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King of Plymouth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Arguments presented in favor of keeping the article do not address the issue of notability. Therefore, consensus supports deletion here. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:52, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

King of Plymouth

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The article and the search results indicate no notability of this event, if it in fact exists.  Sandstein  21:49, 26 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Obviously non-notable, no significant coverage. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 22:17, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  23:01, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep - I have no idea what the article is about, and have little interest in finding out. But Plymouth is the sort of place where alternative cultures thrive (the normal ones are so far away) and I think this has something to say about the town.  Give it time, it might get re-written to be comprehensible and spark off a collection of similar articles.  We can't just go round nominating things we are not interested in, or I'd afd everything about golf, for a start.--Brunnian (talk) 19:16, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete unless much improved. I was only able to learn that this was about a dancing competition from the categories.  If kept, it should become something like King of Plymouth (dance competition).  If the competition is annual (as claimed), I would have expected a list of winners, and for at least some to be notable enough in other contexts to warrnat an article of theri own.  Peterkingiron (talk) 22:28, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.