Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King power


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. per WP:SNOW. Mgm|(talk) 19:27, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

King power

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

May be a Neologism WP:NEO. This terms seems to have been coined in the book: King Power In Chess by Edmar Mednis. . I can't find a single other reference to this phrase in any other book on Chess or Games on Google, Google Book Search, Amazon, or Yahoo. Oliver Twisted  (Talk)  06:09, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I have never heard of such a thing. Is this a hoax? Northwestgnome (talk) 06:21, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. There is no such rule in the game of chess. No, you cannot change the rules of the game by making up new rules and posting them on Wikipedia. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 07:36, 23 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete The article describes your king in checkmate by opponent's queen and rook. You can not say "king power!" and remove both enemy pieces. That is not how chess works. You might as well not charge interest on Monopoly mortgages. Borock (talk) 07:49, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * ;o) -- Oliver  Twisted  (Talk)  07:50, 23 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete No sources are in the article to indicate that this is real, nor could I find any sources for this on the web. Seems to be a neologism or a hoax.   A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 12:07, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - Hoax/vandalism. AlexTiefling (talk) 12:32, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete idiocy. JuJube (talk) 12:36, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Is there anything more nerdy then a hoax about a chess move? Mandsford (talk) 14:24, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete, Speedy per WP:SNOW Hoax, not a real rule, borderline vandalism. Theseeker4 (talk) 15:00, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Hoax and nonsense. Edison (talk) 16:07, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong delete — A made-up chess move. Goes directly to the bin — do not pass Go, do not collect $200. MuZemike  ( talk ) 16:18, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Simply disinformation. I don't know why this was brought to AfD in the first place. -- Jao (talk) 19:06, 23 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.