Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kingdom of Serbia (disambiguation)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Serbian Kingdom. I will leave the editors discretion which article to merge to the other. In any case, this is a non-delete closure. Tone 20:16, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Kingdom of Serbia (disambiguation)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Redundant to Serbian Kingdom as it now stands. Both are disambiguation pages created by User:Sorabino. Since the other one has more history and is older, I am nominating this one. We do not need two disambiguation pages for the same thing. Redirecting it to the other article would also be acceptable. Srnec (talk) 00:27, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. What would be the reason for deletion? Page Kingdom of Serbia (disambiguation) is functioning as a useful DP for the term GBS: "Kingdom of Serbia", while page Serbian Kingdom functions as a useful DP for the term GBS: "Serbian Kingdom". Terms are not identical, they are used in various contexts throughout literature, and therefore both of them are legitimate. It seems to me that proposal for "deletion" has no grounds. Sorabino (talk) 00:44, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * There is no Kingdom of Serbia that is not also a Serbian Kingdom. Pure redundancy of no aid to the reader. Srnec (talk) 01:13, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * You are still not giving any reason for the proposed "deletion" of DP Kingdom of Serbia (disambiguation). Main articles are called Kingdom of Serbia and Kingdom of Serbia (medieval). Therefore, DP Kingdom of Serbia (disambiguation) is obviously useful, and legitimate. No need for "deletion". Sorabino (talk) 01:39, 8 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Srnec is right. Trillfendi (talk) 01:27, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Well, if "Srnec is right" then you should also delete DP Kingdom of Italy (disambiguation) and transfer its content to present redirect Italian Kingdom, but that would be equally absurd. Sorabino (talk) 01:32, 8 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment: I don't think these names are dissimilar enough for separate disambig pages. Instead, I would recommend a merge with two subheadings for "Serbian Kingdom" and "Kingdom of Serbia". I have no opinion under which name this page should be located or which current disambig should be redirected. buidhe (formerly Catrìona) 07:55, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect as per it being quite a valid search term. IMHO I am quite surprised the nominator didn't consider this (or, as it seems, anyone else). It could redirect the other way as well. If there's any slight piece of information lost with the transfer then of course a tiny Smerge could be possible as well.  J 947 &thinsp;(c) , at 08:04, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Of course the other way is fine for me too.  J 947 &thinsp;(c) , at 01:33, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep this one and redirect Serbian Kingdom here. The latter is not a proper dab page IMO: Two realms do not kingdoms make. They can be added here under "See also", however. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:23, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:28, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:28, 8 January 2019 (UTC)


 * There is no need for two pages covering essentially the same topic. Agree with Clarityfiend that this one should be kept and to redirect Serbian Kingdom here. older ≠ wiser 12:18, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - It's a plausible search-term and there is no reason to prefer one over the other for disambiguation purposes. FOARP (talk) 13:46, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * "Kingdom of Serbia (disambiguation)" is not a plausible search term... Srnec (talk) 00:15, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Srnec, now you are not making any sense, regarding search plausibility. Would you say the same for Kingdom of Italy (disambiguation) or any other title that contains addition "(disambiguation)"? Your proposal for "deletion" still remains unclear. Sorabino (talk) 19:40, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * "Kingdom of Italy (disambiguation)" is not a plausible search term. Who would type that? I think perhaps you don't understand how disambiguation pages work or what they're for. My deletion proposal is simple: we have two pages doing the same thing and should only have one. Since you object to a redirect either way, we have to go this route. As I wrote in the nomination, a redirect would (obviously) be acceptable to me in lieu of deletion. Srnec (talk) 01:01, 10 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep and merge Serbian Kingdom to this page. No reason to have two pages, and "Kingdom of Serbia" is the proper name, and would be consistent with other DAB pages of this type. Patar knight - chat/contributions 18:04, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirecting the other page here is a perfectly acceptable solution to me. It was the first thing I did. (I also left a note on the talk page.) I was reverted. (No edit summary.) So I redirected this page there. That was also reverted. (No edit summary, no note, nothing.) So I came here. Srnec (talk) 00:15, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep and merge in Serbian Kingdom per . Nathan2055talk - contribs 21:50, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep and merge in: a good compromise. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:00, 12 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.