Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kingdom of Vicia

Kingdom of Vicia and Elizabeth I of Vicia
An entire (sub-)kingdom under the protection of the United Kingdom with over 750 years of history and yet not a single Google hit. Delete this drivel! [[User:Livajo|&#21147;&#20255;|&#9786;]] 00:21, 20 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Also note that this is an anonymous user's only contribution. [[User:Livajo|&#21147;&#20255;|&#9786;]] 00:25, 20 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Okay, it seems the same user has wasted even more time writing even more drivel. I have listed the page accordingly. [[User:Livajo|&#21147;&#20255;|&#9786;]] 00:40, 20 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Just speedy-delete the stupid thing. I would, if it wasn't here. - DavidWBrooks 00:48, 20 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * I would have done so if there was a speedy case that applied to this article. While it is an obvious attempt to cloak fictional information as truth, that doesn't really qualify as patent nonsense and I felt obliged to put it here instead. [[User:Livajo|&#21147;&#20255;|&#9786;]] 04:42, 20 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Bet the UK can't protect it from being deleted.Wyllium 01:35, 2004 Oct 20 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete both as patent nonsense. Jeez, why couldn't the person responsible for these put the same amount of work and effort into real articles?  Go figure. - Lucky 6.9 00:59, 20 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete -- I do like the Kingdom of Broad Beans, though. --jpgordon {gab} 01:02, 20 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Good effort for a falsehood, though.  Postdlf 01:10, 20 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete both. "Patent nonsense" in the {delete} context is strictly defined as either "Total nonsense, i.e., text that has no assignable meaning at all. This tends to be created after the consumption of too much alcohol." or "Stuff that, while apparently meaningful after a fashion, is so completely and irremediably confused that no intelligent person can be expected to try to make head or tail of it.". I think both articles are FAR too coherent to qualify. fiction!=patent nonsense Niteowlneils 01:45, 20 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Then perhaps we need a speedy delete rule for "utter bullshit"? --jpgordon {gab} 01:57, 20 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Quite possibly (User:Niteowlneils/csdornot/Grunderlings). Also "genealogic research" (User:Niteowlneils/csdornot/Fluge Flugel Flugelman, III)(possibly only after posting the question at the Reference Desk), "personal information" (such as giving out someone's Social Security number or the equivalent), "ASCII art" (User:Niteowlneils/csdornot/Cows), and "fan mail" (User:Niteowlneils/csdornot/NameofWhatever Star), none of which I know of a speedy case they clearly fall under. Niteowlneils 02:38, 20 Oct 2004 (UTC)