Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kingdom of andala


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. (non-admin closure) TBrandley (what's up) 23:54, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Kingdom of andala

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable micronation with no coverage in independent sources.  IgnorantArmies  14:46, 21 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete: A Google search on the phrase "Kingdom of Andala" produced literally two results, both pointing to Wikipedia. An organization with "no indication of importance" qualifies for speedy deletion per A7.  (And I don't regard the official Facebook homepage of this "kingdom" as a "credible claim of significance or importance.") --Mike Agricola (talk) 15:07, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Tempted to go down WP:CSD. A micronation with no external sources, based purely on two 5 day old Facebook pages. The comments on both pages scream WP:HOAX, if not WP:PROMO. Funny  Pika! 15:33, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment and to add, the main body is a cut and paste job - WP:COPYVIO. Funny  Pika! 15:47, 21 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete - There aren't many guidelines this doesn't fail dramatically (although something posted on a Facebook page, then copied here, probably is not a COPYVIO). Lukeno94 (talk) 22:15, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:CSD no credible claim of importance or significance, so tagged. Wikipedia is not for micronations made up one day. JohnCD (talk) 22:58, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.