Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kinghorn Primary School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy redirect to Kinghorn. Trend of the discussion was pointing towards merge and redirect, and speedy deletion is called for under CSD G12 because entire article was a copyvio of the school's webpage. Orlady (talk) 03:42, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Kinghorn Primary School

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. Contester stated schools are always notable. I disagree. Nothing asserts the notability of this primary school Computerjoe 's talk 09:44, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment "They have achieved two eco-schools green flags." might be a claim of notability if it's a rare occurance among primary schools. But either way, we shouldn't worry about notability just yet, let's first see if it's verifiable. (I'm still trying to figure out why some people consider high schools more notable when primary school is what molds someone in who they are). - Mgm|(talk) 11:31, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  -- J.Mundo (talk) 12:44, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing here is verified.  Let's start with that problem before we get to the whole "notability" argument.  JBsupreme (talk) 19:06, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - there is no problem. Verification is easily established. TerriersFan (talk) 00:32, 14 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep per Mgm's comment above. This claim of notability is enough for the school to warrant an article. The information about the eco-green flags can be verified by the Eco School's website. Cunard (talk) 19:18, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Excuse me? No, it is not.  It absolutely is not.  We require non-trivial coverage by third party publications.  Require.  JBsupreme (talk) 19:31, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * http://www.fife-education.org.uk/Ecoschools/greenflag.htm. Five paragraphs about this school's "green achievements". It's certainly a third party publication. Cunard (talk) 20:11, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * No it isn't. It's the education service's website. Computerjoe 's talk 20:47, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The website is not produced by this particular school; it is produced by Fife Eco Schools, which gives "green" awards to a number of schools. http://www.fifedirect.org.uk/atoz/index.cfm?fuseaction=facility.display&facid=F60150F2-E4A6-4206-BC822F37DF2D78F6 is the school's website. Cunard (talk) 21:01, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * That organisation doesn't actually award eco school awards. I suspect that body's similar to a British LEA.
 * Merge to Kinghorn: I don't see this being significantly different from any other primary school, and the standard procedure is to merge nonnotable schools. Nyttend (talk) 20:13, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge to Kinghorn-- I found this news article about the school, I'm willing to change to keep if more sources can be found. --J.Mundo (talk) 23:13, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge/redirect to Kinghorn - not quite enough for a keep but certainly no basis for deletion. TerriersFan (talk) 00:44, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy merge/redirect to the destination identified by TerriersFan. Article is a copyvio of this website. --Orlady (talk) 03:26, 19 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.