Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kingmonster


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 07:51, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Kingmonster

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Clothing company. No sources to establish notability per WP:ORG.  Sandstein  20:39, 3 February 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:18, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:18, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Delete. This article fails the general notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." While the number of search engine hits is usually not enough to establish that there aren't any independent RS out there, it is clear that there aren't any independent RS out there from scouring the first three pages of this Google search.  Arctic   Night  02:45, 10 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. I'll take Arctic Night's word for it. Herostratus (talk) 03:28, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.