Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kings Cross (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 06:12, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Kings Cross (band)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Has obviously been written by someone in the band, vastly detailed descriptions of fairly minor things (such as playing at the 100 Club, being featured on MySpace), lots of references to "they are rumoured to...", etc. Non-notable. MarkRTaylor (talk) 15:17, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 21:38, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 21:38, 6 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. One BBC Essex article and not much else in the way of coverage. A search of chart sites suggests that the claimed hit singles didn't chart.--Michig (talk) 06:56, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment the chart positions are not sourced, and I have tagged them as such. Chart sites tend to only list top 40 material, so they won't be in there, but The Virgin Book of British Hit Singles should list them. That plus the BBC news article makes it a borderline keep, but without the #43 single being sourced, I'd go with delete. Can't really decide without some sourcing. -- Ritchie333  (talk)  15:19, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 05:33, 14 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. keeps charting history past 43. No Kings Cross. Has a little local coverage for the mountain concert thing but nothing that substantial. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:22, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.