Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kingsley's Chicken


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:27, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Kingsley's Chicken

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:ONEEVENT; no significant coverage in RS apart from that event. — swpb T 12:50, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. — swpb T 12:54, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. — swpb T 12:54, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. — swpb T 12:54, 8 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment: Fails WP:CORPDEPTH on currently visible RS sources. They're a significant enough local franchise in Canberra that's been round since 1984, but they never went properly national. There's this amusing sequence from 2010 -- though the Canberra Times stories are no longer online. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 14:03, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * As you say, none of those sources offer sufficient depth of coverage. The CityNews source is an especially trivial mention. — swpb T 12:56, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
 * delete The other coverage I found is plainly routine like an armed robbery. Fails WP:CORP. If it was a national chain it might have some claim to notability but this isn't.  LibStar (talk) 14:42, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete This is a fairly well known fast food chain in Canberra, but is a local firm which hasn't attracted much media attention - searching the Canberra Times archives on Trove (complete text up to 1995) only produces a handful of references. Nick-D (talk) 23:21, 13 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.