Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kingsley (YouTuber)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:50, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Kingsley (YouTuber)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable youtuber, most of the citations are unreliable and a large part of the article is written like an advertisement. Eternal Shadow  Talk  16:28, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  Eternal Shadow   Talk  16:28, 9 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep, Although it have most of the references which are from YouTube but some of them seem to be Reliable one which makes it pass Wp:BASIC. Stonertone (talk) 16:54, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete The sourcing just isn't there for this to be notable. There are some none YouTube references, but they are all trivial and/or interviews. Which don't work for notability. --Adamant1 (talk) 18:46, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  ~ Amkgp  💬  18:57, 9 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete — per rationale provided by & . Celestina007 (talk) 20:42, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete there is a total lack of reliable, in-depth, 3rd party secondary source independent coverage needed to establish notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:03, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable --Devokewater (talk) 21:21, 13 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.