Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kingstie (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 16:58, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Kingstie
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

One-time hoax; fails GNG –dlthewave ☎ 17:56, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Appears to indeed be a non-notable hoax. Some fringe authors appear to have ran with it, but I'm not finding anything particularly notable. &#58;bloodofox: (talk) 18:17, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 14:44, 7 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. Wikipedia can keep articles about noteworthy hoaxes that received enough media coverage to clear WP:GNG, but it is not our role to keep an article about every hoax that anybody ever hoaxed — and this isn't sourced well enough to deem it special. Bearcat (talk) 20:15, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 14:48, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mythology-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 14:48, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 22:20, 8 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.