Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kinnear House


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Merge to Helen Alice Kinnear. —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-27 07:55Z 

Kinnear House

 * — (View AfD)

The judge may be noteworthy; I don't think her house is. Akihabara 13:53, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to an article on the judge. Nothing notable about her house. Edison 16:38, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. According to the article, the house is conserved as a noteworthy local property, so it can be expanded to include more information about the history of the house and details of the conservation, such as (maybe) why it is conserved and what has been done to the house since it was added to the database for conservation. Thaurisil 07:38, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:48, 19 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Merge to Kinnear's article. No assertion of notability of the house. Ter e nce Ong 07:01, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Thaurisil. A property that is conserved as noteworthy is notable and since it is mentioned in the article, an assertion has in fact been made. - Mgm|(talk) 11:12, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Thaurisil. -Toptomcat 14:30, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Thaurisil has misread the notability claim. The house is not a museum or conserved, it is just well-kept and has been added to a LOCAL listing of structures with historic ties. It is not a designated landmark (by the same entity) as are several other sites in the town, nor does it seem to have been given any provincial or federal designation that would be the equivalent of the US National Register of Historic Places or the UK Listed building. At most of local significance, but it is demonstrably less notable than other local structures by not being "designated". --Dhartung | Talk 09:11, 20 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.