Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kionic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. bainer (talk) 09:33, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

Kionic
advertisement.I vote Delete Deyyaz 02:41, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Advert for non-notable company. Jasmol 03:21, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Ad. Billbrock 03:58, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unless it can be verified. If someone wants to rewrite it in a non-advertising form, though, with references, it should be allowed to stay.  Wikipedia doesn't need notability requirements. &mdash;Simetrical (talk) 04:40, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per jasmol. I don't see a rewrite making it notable, but I could be suprised...--SarekOfVulcan 09:48, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable company. &mdash; J I P  | Talk 09:49, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, advert. - Mgm|(talk) 12:43, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete because non-notable companies are functionally unverifiable, the only source of information is uusally the company itself (hence WP:CORP). Although strictly we could get their returns from the tax office, that would be original research. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 15:21, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * delete unless I start hearing about this company popular advertising venues J\/\/estbrook       20:23, 16 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.