Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kirakira (video game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Withdrawn by nominator, the sole delete has not offered a viable counter-argument for discovered sources. (non-admin closure) ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 05:53, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Kirakira (video game)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Nothing in the article suggests this game is notable; single footnote is to some Internet radio show whose relation to the game is not even clear from the article. Metacritic has no reviews. Maybe sources exist in Japanese, but nothing useful seems to be found on ja wiki. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 01:31, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Japan. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  01:31, 8 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete: Per nom. TheBritinator (talk) 13:33, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen&times; &#9742;  12:08, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment The game did get significant coverage in Siliconera, suggesting there is potentially more out there despite the vague name not doing it many favors. It also got a review from UK Anime Network, but the jury is out on whether they are reliable. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 23:10, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep - Reviews in Siliconera and RPG Fan, both reliable per WP:VG/S. 2 reviews in UK Anime Network:, . Per WP:A&M/RS reviews by Andy Hanley are reliable. --Mika1h (talk) 13:08, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep Per Mika1h, the game has enough sources to pass WP:GNG. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Withdrawing. Sources located above address my concerns. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 02:41, 16 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.